Legal Opinion
Pakdel v. City and County of San Francisco
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided June 28, 2021No. 20-1212PublishedCited by 125 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Cite as:
594 U. S. ____
(2021) 1 Per Curiam SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES PEYMAN PAKDEL, ET UX. v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA, ET AL. ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT No. 20–1212. Decided June 28, 2021 PER CURIAM. When a plaintiff alleges a regulatory taking in violation of the Fifth Amendment, a federal court should not consider the claim before the government has reached a “final” deci- sion. Suitum v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency,
520 U. S. 725, 737
(1997). After all, until the government makes up its mind,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Woodford v. NgoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Palazzolo v. Rhode IslandSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- MacDonald, Sommer & Frates v. Yolo CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Suitum v. Tahoe Regional Planning AgencySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by125 opinions
- Kino Bonelli v. Grand Canyon UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
- Charles Andrews, Sr. v. City of Mentor, OhioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021
- 74 Pinehurst LLC v. State of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2023
- Blanche Barber v. Charter Twp. of Springfield, Mich.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2022
- Epcon Homestead, LLC v. Town of Chapel HillCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2023
120 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.