Maas v. City of Mountain Home
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Lavenski R. Smith, Justice.
This is an illegal-exaction case. Appellants, Citizens of Mountain Home, Arkansas, contend Mountain Home (“The City”), appellees herein, violated Article 16, Section 11, of the Arkansas Constitution by using sales-tax proceeds contrary to exclusive uses contained in City Ordinance No. 646. We agree and reverse.
On April 9, 1981, the City passed Ordinance No. 646, which levied a one-cent sales tax. The following month, the City conducted a special election wherein the voters could approve or reject the proposed tax. Prior to the election, on April 23, 1981, the City…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Daniel v. JonesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
- Dillard v. Resolution Trust Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
- Ragar v. BrownSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
- Oldner v. VillinesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
- Arkansas-Missouri Power Corp. v. City of RectorSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1949
3Cited by18 opinions
- City of South Haven v. Van Buren County Board of CommissionersMichigan Supreme Court · 2007
- Maddox v. City of Fort SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
- City of Fayetteville v. Washington CountySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
- Williams v. City of FayettevilleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
- Barclay v. WatersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.