Legal Opinion

Maas v. City of Mountain Home

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 17, 1999No. 98-1337PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lavenski R. Smith, Justice.

This is an illegal-exaction case. Appellants, Citizens of Mountain Home, Arkansas, contend Mountain Home (“The City”), appellees herein, violated Article 16, Section 11, of the Arkansas Constitution by using sales-tax proceeds contrary to exclusive uses contained in City Ordinance No. 646. We agree and reverse.

On April 9, 1981, the City passed Ordinance No. 646, which levied a one-cent sales tax. The following month, the City conducted a special election wherein the voters could approve or reject the proposed tax. Prior to the election, on April 23, 1981, the City…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Daniel v. JonesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  2. Dillard v. Resolution Trust Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  3. Ragar v. BrownSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  4. Oldner v. VillinesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  5. Arkansas-Missouri Power Corp. v. City of RectorSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1949

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. City of South Haven v. Van Buren County Board of CommissionersMichigan Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Maddox v. City of Fort SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  3. City of Fayetteville v. Washington CountySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
  4. Williams v. City of FayettevilleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  5. Barclay v. WatersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API