Legal Opinion

Barclay v. Waters

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 20, 2004No. 03-369PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Betty C. Dickey, Chief Justice.

This appeal represents the ice. illegal-exaction challenge against the imposition of a local one-percent compensating-use tax within Pulaski County. Based on Daniel v. Jones, 332 Ark. 489, 966 S.W.2d 226 (1998), which the trial court claimed overruled City of Little Rock v. Waters, 303 Ark. 363, 797 S.W.2d 426 (1990) (Waters I), the trial court ruled that the imposition of a one-percent compensating use tax pursuant to Act 31 of 1987, First Extraordinary Session, was invalid because the affected taxpayers were not allowed to vote for or against the tax, but that…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Schiro v. FarleySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Daniel v. JonesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  3. Crockett & Brown, P.A. v. WilsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  4. Pledger v. BosnickSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
  5. Carwell Elevator Co., Inc. v. LeathersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Craven v. Fulton Sanitation Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
  2. Hall v. Equity National Life InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2010
  3. Gough v. Transamerica Life InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2011
  4. Stanley v. FinneganDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2018
  5. Barclay v. WatersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API