Legal Opinion

City of South Haven v. Van Buren County Board of Commissioners

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 11, 2007No. Docket 131011PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Per curiam

At issue in this case is whether defendants violated MCL 224.20b by presenting and securing voter approval of a road millage proposal and, if so, what remedy is available. We affirm the Court of Appeals decision that the millage proposal in this case violated the allocation provisions of MCL 224.20b, but reverse the Court of Appeals order remanding the case because, under the facts presented, plaintiff is not entitled to any of the remedies it seeks.

i

The statute at issue in this case is MCL 224.20b,* 1 which permits county boards of commissioners to propose tax levies, also known as millage…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Roberts v. Mecosta County General HospitalMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Farrington v. Total Petroleum, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1993
  3. National Wildlife Federation v. Cleveland Cliffs Iron Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Lee v. MacOmb County Board of CommissionersMichigan Supreme Court · 2001
  5. People v. Hawkins; People v. ScherfMichigan Supreme Court · 2003

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Department of Agriculture v. Appletree Marketing, LLCMichigan Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Petersen v. Magna Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Speicher v. Columbia Township Board of TrusteesMichigan Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Salem Springs, LLC v. Salem TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. Michigan Education Ass'n v. Secretary of StateMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API