Legal Opinion

Maddox v. City of Fort Smith

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 11, 2001No. 01-117PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Annabelle Clinton Imber, Justice.

This is an illegal-exaction case brought pursuant to Article 16, §§ 11 and 13, of the Arkansas Constitution. The appellants, Bill Maddox, Bill Grace, Jerry Frisby, Melba Riggs, and Charles Beasley, on behalf of themselves and the citizens, residents, taxpayers, and utility ratepayers of the City of Fort Smith, appeal the summary-judgment order of the Sebastian County Chancery Court dismissing their illegal-exaction and unlawful-transfer claims against the appellee, the City of Fort Smith. The appellants claim that the City has been illegally spending its share…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Wallace v. BroylesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  2. Daniel v. JonesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  3. Harris v. City of Little RockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  4. Wallace v. BroylesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  5. Foster v. Jefferson County Quorum CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Lake View School District No. 25 v. HuckabeeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  2. Coleman v. Regions BankSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
  3. Owens v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  4. Echols v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  5. Windsong Enterprises, Inc. v. UptonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API