Legal Opinion

Hamilton v. Hannus

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 20, 1912No. 7387PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from Baylor County Court; Nat G. Mitchell, Judge. Action by J. J. Hannus against J. W. Hamilton. Prom a judgment for plaintiff on appeal from a justice, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

This is an appeal from a judgment of the county court in appellee's favor for the sum of $184, the amount found to be due upon a promissory note in the sum of $126.

The transcript before us discloses a transcript from the justice's court showing that the suit upon the note mentioned had originated therein, and reciting that the plaintiff, J. J. Hannus, had recovered a judgment against the defendant, J. W. Hamilton, on July 27, 1909, but the justice's transcript does not contain the judgment so recited, and wholly fails to show that any appeal bond, as required by law, had been given or…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Home Insurance v. Baltimore Warehouse Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. International & Great Northern Railway Co. v. RagsdaleTexas Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Holt v. GordonTexas Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Houston & Texas Central Railroad v. ParkerTexas Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Patrick v. PierceTexas Supreme Court · 1916

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Whitsett v. WhitsettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1947
  2. American General Ins. Co. v. Fort Worth Transit Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1947
  3. Pullin v. ParrishCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957
  4. Cook v. BarrierCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
  5. Cotten v. BierCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1943

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API