Legal Opinion

Holt v. Gordon

Texas Supreme Court

Decided April 7, 1915No. 2386PublishedCited by 50 opinions

Questions certified from tire Court of Civil Appeals, Second District, in an appeal from Erath County.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Phillips

The certificate of the honorable Court of Civil Appeals, which contains the question propounded for determination, is as follows:

“In the above entitled cause plaintiff, B. T. Holt, sued to recover judgment against defendant, F. J. Gordon, on three promissory notes executed hy defendant in plaintiff's favor. According to allegations in plaintiff's petition two of the notes were for the principal sum of seven hundred and fifty dollars each, dated September 28, 1906, and executed contemporaneously with a deed from plaintiff to defendant to sixty acres of land upon which a vendor’s lien was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Burke v. DulaneySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Blewitt v. . BoorumNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  3. Loving v. DixonTexas Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Pope v. TaliaferroCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1908
  5. East Texas Fire Insurance v. James K. Clarke & Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1892

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Denman v. HallTexas Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Baker v. BakerTexas Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Bell v. RuddTexas Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Perry v. LittleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
  5. Rincones v. WindbergCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1986

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API