Legal Opinion
Pullin v. Parrish
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided September 18, 1957No. 13233PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
POPE, Justice.
The point in this case is whether a party may appeal from a justice court verdict instead of a judgment. The District Court of Hidalgo County refused a temporary injunction to restrain the issuance and service of a writ of possession, and the tenant has appealed. Appellant, Marvin Pullin, is the farm tenant of James W. Parrish’s predecessor in title. Parrish, hereafter called landlord, sued in forcible entry, and the jury in the Justice Court of Hidalgo County found the tenant not guilty. The justice recorded the verdict on the docket in these words: “3-19-57 Case tried before 6…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Childress Oil Co. v. WoodTexas Supreme Court · 1921
- Roberts v. ConnelleeTexas Supreme Court · 1888
- Clay v. ClayTexas Supreme Court · 1851
- Hamilton v. HannusCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912
- Wahrenberger v. HoranTexas Supreme Court · 1856
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Dent v. PinesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965
- Darrow v. Texas Department of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965
- Coleman v. JournetCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1993
- Pullin v. Parrish Farms, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1959
- Housing Authority, City of Edgewood v. Sanders, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.