Legal Opinion

International & Great Northern Railway Co. v. Ragsdale

Texas Supreme Court

Decided November 19, 1886No. 1963PublishedCited by 53 opinions

Appeal from Medina. Tried below before the Hoíi. T. M. Paschal.

1Opinion of the Court

Gaines, Associate Justice.

Appellants’ application for a continuance was properly overruled. His bond by which the case was appealed from the justice court, where it was originally tried, to the district court, was filed October 4, 1884. The cause was called for trial in the district court on the seventeenth day of the same month. The witness Gooch, whose testimony was sought, is shown, by the record to have been in the employment of defendant not very long before the application, and it might be inferred was in its employment still. It would seem, therefore, that by proper diligence there was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Home Insurance v. Baltimore Warehouse Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. May v. SladeTexas Supreme Court · 1859

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. WilbornCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992
  2. Bockelmann v. MarynickTexas Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Empire Gas & Fuel Co. v. PendarCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  4. Elser v. GraberTexas Supreme Court · 1887
  5. McCall v. MarshallTexas Supreme Court · 1965

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API