Legal Opinion

Jones v. Carolina Power & Light Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided July 11, 1934PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.

The defendant assails the validity of the trial principally upon the ground: first, that the alleged contract of employment is too indefinite; and, second, that defendant’s agent’s authority to make such a contract, if made, is nonexistent and nonapparent.

The contract as established by the verdict is not void for indefiniteness. Stevens v. R. R., 187 N. C., 528, 122 S. E., 295; Fisher v. Lamber Co., 183 N. C., 485, 111 S. E., 857.

The law is stated in 39 C. J., 41, as follows: “It has been held further that the relinquishment of a present position in reliance on a promise to give permanent…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Fisher v. . Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  2. Fisher v. John L. Roper Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  3. Hill v. . BeanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
  4. Stephens v. John L. Roper Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  5. Sutton v. . LyonsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Rowe v. Noren Pattern & Foundry Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Parrish v. Boysell Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  3. Tuttle v. Kernersville Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  4. Collins v. Parsons CollegeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1973
  5. Kiser v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of Virginia · 1938

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API