Jones v. Carolina Power & Light Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.
The defendant assails the validity of the trial principally upon the ground: first, that the alleged contract of employment is too indefinite; and, second, that defendant’s agent’s authority to make such a contract, if made, is nonexistent and nonapparent.
The contract as established by the verdict is not void for indefiniteness. Stevens v. R. R., 187 N. C., 528, 122 S. E., 295; Fisher v. Lamber Co., 183 N. C., 485, 111 S. E., 857.
The law is stated in 39 C. J., 41, as follows: “It has been held further that the relinquishment of a present position in reliance on a promise to give permanent…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Fisher v. . Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
- Fisher v. John L. Roper Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
- Hill v. . BeanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
- Stephens v. John L. Roper Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
- Sutton v. . LyonsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Rowe v. Noren Pattern & Foundry Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1979
- Parrish v. Boysell Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
- Tuttle v. Kernersville Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- Collins v. Parsons CollegeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1973
- Kiser v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of Virginia · 1938
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.