Hester v. Horton Motor Lines
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.
The instant case is controlled by the principles announced in Lewis v. Hunter, 212 N. C., 504, 193 S. E., 814, and West v. Baking Co., 208 N. C., 526, 181 S. E., 551.
Appeal op Heebeet OolemaN.
The record discloses a clear case of negligence on the part of the driver of the Ford coupe in which plaintiff’s intestate was riding at the time of her injuries. He and his companions had spent a night out, riding around town, drinking, etc. It ended in tragedy. Coleman’s contention that his ear struck the side of the bridge as a result of a blowout was not accepted by the jury.
The defendant’s plea of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Holland v. Southern Public Utilities Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
- Hubbard v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
- Parrish v. Boysell Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
- Lewis v. . HunterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
- Gillam v. . EdmonsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- United States v. BrooksCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1949
- Commercial Solvents, Inc. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Fanelty v. Rogers Jewelers, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
- Branch v. DempseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- McGill v. Bison Fast Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.