De Olazabal v. Mix
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtWhite, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of the defendant in an action at law brought on five promissory notes. Briefly, the facts are that at the time of the execution of the notes in question, the plaintiff and defendant were wife and husband, and the parents of a minor daughter. The parties subsequently divorced, and both have remarried. On July 9, 1928, defendant Tom Mix made and executed the five promissory notes, payable at staggered dates, to the order of plaintiff, each in the sum of $10,000. The notes were presented for payment after the due date which appeared on each of them…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Mitau v. RoddanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Booth v. Oakland Bank of SavingsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Lefrooth v. PrenticeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Michael v. . FoilSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
- Hanlon v. DohertyIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- People v. AbairCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Petty v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- First National Trust & Savings Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Manti v. GunariCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Toomey v. ToomeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.