Legal Opinion

Toomey v. Toomey

California Supreme Court

Decided April 21, 1939No. Sac. 5138PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSeawell, J.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment entered for defendants after sustaining of a demurrer to her third amended complaint. The action is to annul a property settlement. The defendant husband has been adjudged incompetent, and hence the guardian of his estate is also a defendant. Plaintiff avers that her husband procured her consent to the property agreement by fraudulently misrepresenting the value of his property, and by threat of physical violence to her, and, further, that they became reconciled and resumed marital relations with the understanding that the agreement ‘ ‘ was fully abandoned…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Victor Oil Co. v. DrumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Wolpert v. GriptonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Estate of BoesonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Loock v. Pioneer Title Insurance and Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1935
  5. De Olazabal v. MixCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Maguire v. Hibernia Savings & Loan SocietyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Austin v. Hallmark Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Tostevin v. DouglasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  4. Clanton v. ClantonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  5. Corcoran v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API