Legal Opinion

Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Stotelmyer, D.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 17, 2015No. 73 MAP 2013PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice EAKIN.

This appeal by the Commonwealth raises the issue of whether a defendant is statutorily eligible, within the meaning of 42 Pa.C.S. § 9802, to receive a county intermediate punishment sentence when a mandatory minimum sentence applies under 18 Pa.C.S. § 7508. We conclude the Superior Court erred in holding such an offender is eligible, and accordingly, reverse.

After state police seized over two and one-half pounds of marijuana from appellee’s residence pursuant to a search warrant, appellee was charged with possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver (PWID)1…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. HartSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  2. Commonwealth v. HansleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  3. Commonwealth v. HackerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  4. Commonwealth v. MazzettiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  5. Commonwealth v. StotelmyerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Farabaugh, R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  2. Commonwealth v. AndersonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  3. Commonwealth v. DerhammerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  4. Commonwealth v. KenneySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  5. Commonwealth v. HoffmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API