Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Hansley

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 17, 2012PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Chief Justice CASTILLE.

The issue in this appeal is whether the Recidivism Risk Reduction Incentive Act, 61 Pa.C.S. §§ 4501-4512 (“RRRI Act”), which makes certain offenders eligible for release on parole before the expiration of their minimum terms of imprisonment, applies to defendants who are sentenced to mandatory minimum terms required by two drug trafficking sentencing provisions, 18 Pa.C.S. § 6817 and § 7508. The Superior Court concluded that the RRRI Act was applicable, and affirmed the judgments of sentence imposed by the trial court. For the reasons, set forth below, we affirm.

O…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. CooperSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  2. Commonwealth v. McCoySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  3. Commonwealth v. BradleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  4. Commonwealth v. GarzoneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  5. Commonwealth v. KlingensmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. TobinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Commonwealth v. MusauSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  3. Commonwealth v. ConcordiaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  4. Commonwealth v. Chester, M., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  5. Homa v. Pa. Bd. of Prob. & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2018

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API