Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Hart

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 28, 2011No. 9 MAP 2010PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice TODD.

In this appeal, we consider whether the mere offer of an automobile ride to a child constitutes an attempt to “lure” the child under Section 2910 of Pennsylvania’s Criminal Code, entitled “Luring a child into a motor vehicle or structure.” 1 After careful review, we conclude that an attempt to “lure” does not include the action of simply extending an offer of an automobile ride to a child, when it is unaccompanied by any other enticement or inducement for the child to enter the motor vehicle. Consequently, we reverse the conviction of Appellant, Walter J. Hart III, for…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. WrightSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  2. Commonwealth v. EichingerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  3. Commonwealth v. Rieck Investment Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  4. Commonwealth v. FithianSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  5. Commonwealth v. McClinticSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Bruno, D., Aplts. v. Erie InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Commonwealth v. JohnsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  3. Com. v. Simmons, D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
  4. In The Interest of J.B. Appeal of: J.B.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  5. In re Nomination Petition of BeyerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API