Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Hacker

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 18, 2011No. 18 WAP 2009PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice EAKIN.

Appellee’s then-13-year-old nephew, CG, and his 12-year-old female friend, NA, regularly visited her apartment. One night, playing a game of “truth or dare,” appellee dared NA to perform oral sex on CG; when NA refused, appellee threatened to inform NA’s mother that she had misbehaved. Appellee then took NA by the hand, walked her across the bedroom, and sat her down next to CG. NA then performed oral sex on CG.

A jury convicted appellee of solicitation 1 to commit the rape of a child,2 and the trial court sentenced appellee accordingly. In post-trial motions, appellee…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In Re Milton Hershey SchoolSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. Commonwealth v. AlbertSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. Snead v. Society for Prevention of Cruelty to AnimalsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  4. Commonwealth v. SamuelsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  5. Commonwealth v. HackerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  2. Commonwealth v. GriffithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  3. Commonwealth v. MillerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  4. Rost, Richard, M., Exec. v. Ford Motor Co., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  5. Commonwealth, Aplt v. Kingston, S.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2016

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API