Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Mazzetti

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 4, 2012No. 45 MAP 2011PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*557 OPINION

2Per curiam

In this matter of first impression we are asked to decide whether the Commonwealth’s waiver of application of the school zone mandatory minimum sentence, under 18 Pa.C.S. § 6317,1 at the original sentencing precludes the Commonwealth from subsequently seeking its application following the revocation of probation. For the reasons that follow, we conclude that the statutory scheme precludes the Commonwealth from requesting imposition of the mandatory minimum at resentencing after waiving its initial applicability. Accordingly, we affirm the order of the Superior Court.

On July 23, 2008,…

3Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Monge v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  2. Commonwealth v. MallorySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  3. Fonner v. Shandon, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  4. Commonwealth v. InfanteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  5. Commonwealth v. JohnsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by33 opinions

  1. Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Hopkins, K.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  2. Commonwealth v. InfanteSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  3. Harmon v. Unemployment Comp. Bd. of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  4. Commonwealth v. TannSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  5. Commonwealth v. Moran, ApltSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API