Cameron v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
RADER, Chief Judge.
The Court of Federal Claims found that Col. Daniel Cameron, a retired officer of the Oregon National Guard, was not improperly denied consideration by a retention board before he was discharged from active duty. Because the army regulations in effect at the time entitled Col. Cameron to review by a retention board, this court reverses and remands.
I
Col. Cameron enlisted in the Army in 1981, accepted a commission as a U.S. Army Reserve Corps officer in 1983, and entered the Active Guard Reserve (AGR) under Title 32 for the Oregon National Guard in 1998. In 2003, he received…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Bowles v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- United States v. LarionoffSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Christopher v. Smithkline Beecham Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Reflectone, Inc. v. John H. Dalton, Secretary of the NavyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Miller v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Williams v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Brass v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Clark v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2025
- Wollman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014