Legal Opinion
State v. Souders
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided June 5, 1985No. 30603, 30604, 30605, 30606; CA A31660 (control); 30607, 30608; CA A31661PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNewman, J.
The state appeals a pretrial order that granted each defendant’s motion to suppress evidence that the police seized pursuant to two search warrants. ORS 138.060(3). The first warrant authorized the police to search for a concealable weapon in Souders’ residence. Both defendants lived there. During execution of the first warrant, the officers seized a concealable weapon and discovered evidence of methamphetamine manufacture in the house. The officers obtained a second search warrant under which they seized both methamphetamines and heroin.
Souders was charged with being an ex-convict in…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- State v. VillagranOregon Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. CarlileOregon Supreme Court · 1980
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. PrinceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
- State v. Christen/HankinsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
- State v. FinkCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
- State v. McBrideCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
- State v. DunningCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.