Legal Opinion

State v. McBride

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 26, 1989No. C86-12-36300 CA A45215 (Control) C86-12-36299, C86-12-36298 CA A44448 (Control), CA A44446 C86-12-36297, C86-12-36296 CA A44749 (Control), CA A44750PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNewman, J.

State v. McBride, State v. Pursifull (two cases) and State v. Symes (two cases), have been consolidated for opinion. A single affidavit set forth the information upon which the magistrate issued three warrants to search, respectively, the residences of McBride, the Pursifulls and the Symeses. All defendants moved to suppress evidence that the police seized in their respective residences. The court also heard motions to controvert and the motions to suppress in a single hearing and considered the motions to controvert as if they were one motion to controvert on behalf of all defendants,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Ball v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  5. State v. VillagranOregon Supreme Court · 1983

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  2. State v. PoppeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  3. State v. MilksCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  4. State v. RussellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  5. State v. BarrazaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API