Legal Opinion

State v. Dunning

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 10, 1986No. C85-03-30821; CA A36715PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*298YOUNG, J.

Defendant seeks reversal of his conviction for the unlawful delivery of a controlled substance. ORS 475.992(1).1 He makes three challenges to the lawfulness of the search warrant. We affirm.

Defendant first argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion to controvert. ORS 133.693.2 The affidavit in support of the search warrant recites that most of the affiant’s information came from a named special agent of the U. S. Drug Enforcement Administration, who in turn received his information from a “confidential reliable informant.” The affiant also received information directly…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. State v. MontigueOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  4. State v. DiazCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  5. State v. KittredgeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. HittOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State v. ShumwayCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  3. State v. NuttallCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  4. State v. Morrison/BarteeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  5. State v. ClarkeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API