Legal Opinion

Roberts v. Hocker

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 2, 1980No. KCD 30635PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHANGLER, Judge.

The appeal comes from a judgment adverse to a petition for damages and mandatory injunction on a claim that the defend ants unreasonably diverted surface water onto the land of the plaintiffs.

The contentions are as to contiguous tracts on a strip of land situated between Highway 40 to the north and 1-70 to the south. The upper one-third of the land lies within the limits of Independence and the remainder two-thirds, within Kansas City. The land sited in Independence fronts on Highway 40 and is used for commercial purposes. The land sited in Kansas City fronts 1-70 and is used…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  2. Benson v. Chicago & Alton RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
  3. Happy v. KentonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1952
  4. Haferkamp v. City of Rock HillSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
  5. Higday v. NickolausMissouri Court of Appeals · 1971

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Looney v. HindmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1983
  2. Hansen v. Gary Naugle Construction Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1990
  3. Kueffer v. BrownMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. Bettinger v. City of SpringfieldMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. Klokkenga v. CarolanMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API