Legal Opinion

Higday v. Nickolaus

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 7, 1971No. 25627PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHANGLER, Presiding Judge.

This appeal is from a judgment dismissing plaintiffs’ Petition for Declaratory Judgment and Injunction. The judgment of dismissal was entered upon defendant City’s Motion to Dismiss which alleged that plaintiffs’ petition failed to plead either a justiciable controversy or any claim upon which relief could be granted. The questions raised on this appeal are: whether the averments of the petition entitle plaintiffs, to a judicial declaration of their rights to the percolating waters underlying their lands, and if so, whether defendant City’s threatened use of the…

2Cases cited55 opinions

  1. Katz v. WalkinshawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Chatfield v. WilsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1855
  3. Bristor v. CheathamArizona Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Maricopa County Municipal Water Conservation District Number One v. Southwest Cotton Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Tietjens v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1949

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Heins Implement Co. v. Missouri Highway & Transportation CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  2. King v. MooreheadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1973
  3. United States v. Conservation Chemical Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1986
  4. Community Title Co. v. Roosevelt Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Missouri Alliance for Retired Americans v. Department of Labor & Industrial RelationsSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API