Legal Opinion

Bettinger v. City of Springfield

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 28, 2005No. 26391PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KENNETH W. SHRUM, Judge.

This suit by Gerard and Karen Betting-er (“Plaintiffs”) against the City of Springfield, Missouri (“City”), seeks damages based on a theory of inverse condemnation. They claim City took their real estate for public use without fairly compensating them. Plaintiffs allege this taking occurred when a public drainage system failed to carry away surface water run-off that collected therein as a result of heavy rainfall; and, when the overflow escaped the confines of the drainage easement, the water damaged Plaintiffs’ residential property. City’s motion for summary judgment…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. ITT Commercial Finance Corp. v. Mid-America Marine Supply Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  2. Paddock v. SomesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1890
  3. Heins Implement Co. v. Missouri Highway & Transportation CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  4. Abbott v. Kansas City, St. Joseph & Council Bluffs RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1884
  5. Happy v. KentonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1952

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Burg v. DampierMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. Atkinson v. CorsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. Basham v. City of CubaMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. Hensley-O'Neal v. Metropolitan National BankMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. Klokkenga v. CarolanMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API