Bettinger v. City of Springfield
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
KENNETH W. SHRUM, Judge.
This suit by Gerard and Karen Betting-er (“Plaintiffs”) against the City of Springfield, Missouri (“City”), seeks damages based on a theory of inverse condemnation. They claim City took their real estate for public use without fairly compensating them. Plaintiffs allege this taking occurred when a public drainage system failed to carry away surface water run-off that collected therein as a result of heavy rainfall; and, when the overflow escaped the confines of the drainage easement, the water damaged Plaintiffs’ residential property. City’s motion for summary judgment…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- ITT Commercial Finance Corp. v. Mid-America Marine Supply Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1993
- Paddock v. SomesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1890
- Heins Implement Co. v. Missouri Highway & Transportation CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
- Abbott v. Kansas City, St. Joseph & Council Bluffs RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1884
- Happy v. KentonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1952
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Burg v. DampierMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011
- Atkinson v. CorsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009
- Basham v. City of CubaMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008
- Hensley-O'Neal v. Metropolitan National BankMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009
- Klokkenga v. CarolanMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.