Legal Opinion

Hansen v. Gary Naugle Construction Co.

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided December 18, 1990No. 72631PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERTSON, Judge.

Plaintiffs Dennis and Deborah Hansen and Morey and Wan-Tsih Chao brought *73suit against defendant, Gary Naugle Construction Company (Naugle), for damages allegedly sustained as a result of an increase in the volume and velocity of surface water runoff following Naugle’s development of land lying uphill from plaintiffs’ property. The trial court, without a jury, found Naugle liable for trespass and/or nuisance and awarded the Hansens and the Chaos $5,800 each in damages. The Court of Appeals, Western District, reversed. We granted transfer to consider the applicability of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  2. Frank v. Environmental Sanitation Management, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1985
  3. Marriage of T.B.G. v. C.A.G.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1989
  4. Haferkamp v. City of Rock HillSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
  5. Looney v. HindmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Goerlitz v. City of MaryvilleSupreme Court of Missouri · 2011
  2. Pipefitters Welfare Educational Fund v. Westchester Fire Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
  3. Pipefitters Welfare Educational Fund v. Westchester Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
  4. Heins Implement Co. v. Missouri Highway & Transportation CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  5. Locklin v. City of LafayetteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API