Legal Opinion
Jones v. Andrews
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided February 9, 1954No. 34963PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTownsend, J.
1. The bill of exceptions here contains one valid assignment of error upon a final judgment, as follows: “To the order of the court directing a verdict, and to the verdict, plaintiff in attachment then excepted, and now excepts, and assigns the same as error.” This is sufficient to prevent dismissal of the bill of exceptions, and to raise the question of whether the verdict was demanded as directed. Mullis v. McCook, 185 Ga. 171 (1) (194 S. E. 171).
2. Only such errors as are properly assigned in the bill of exceptions can be considered by this court. Where in the bill of exceptions an order…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Mullis v. McCookSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
- Armitage-Herschell Co. v. Muscogee Real Estate Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Ayares Small Loan Co. Inc. v. MastonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949
- Bank of LaGrange v. RutlandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
- Morris Plan Bank v. GinnCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Manchester Motors, Inc. v. FARMERS &C. BANK OF MANCHESTERCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955
- Lewis v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
- Durham v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1964
- Hudgens v. Meeks & Hammond Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1958
- Simmons v. Springfield Atlantic BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1954
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.