Legal Opinion

Morris Plan Bank v. Ginn

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 9, 1937No. 26434PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMacIntyre, J.

This is a contest as to priority between an attachment and a conditional-sale contract. The verdict was in favor of the plaintiffs in attachment who are defendants in error here. The attachment, issued on February 17, 1936, was sued out by Ginn’s Garage against M. Lovell, and was duly levied on the car in question. On March 3, 1936, the Morris Plan Bank of Virginia, as transferee of Larry Moore Inc., of Virginia, filed a claim based upon a conditional-sale contract transferred to them by Larry Moore Inc. C. P. Ginn, one of the plaintiffs in attachment, testified that there was a wreck near…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Armitage-Herschell Co. v. Muscogee Real Estate Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  2. Smith Motor Car Co. v. Universal Credit Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1933
  3. C. I. T. Corp. v. ColemanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Pilot Life Insurance Co. v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1956
  2. Jones v. AndrewsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1954
  3. Robinson v. Washington National InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1945
  4. National Life & Accident Insurance v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
  5. Simmons v. Springfield Atlantic BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1954

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API