Legal Opinion

Hudgens v. Meeks & Hammond Lumber Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 20, 1958No. 36954PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Gardner, Presiding Judge.

1. Counsel for the employer contend that the bill of exceptions should be dismissed because the alleged errors are not properly assigned. Counsel cites in support of this contention Jones v. Andrews, 89 Ga. App. 734 (2) (81 S. E. 2d 304). While headnote 2 in that case states that only such errors as are properly assigned in the bill of exceptions can be considered by this court, the court properly went on and passed on the assignments of error which were properly presented and then affirmed the judgment of the trial court. That case is not authority for dismissal of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Jones v. AndrewsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1954
  2. Brown v. Marks Auto SalesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1956
  3. Soman v. YeagerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1952

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Reliance Insurance Co. v. OliverCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
  2. Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. AlonsoCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
  3. Integrity National Life Insurance v. DavidCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API