Legal Opinion

Mullis v. McCook

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided October 7, 1937No. 11953PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bell, Justice.

In a suit for cancellation of a judgment and execution, and for other equitable relief, the court at the close of the evidence directed a verdict in favor of the plaintiff. The defendant, without filing a motion for a new trial, sued out a bill of exceptions containing several assignments of error on the direction of the verdict, one of which was a general statement that “the court erred in directing a verdict” for the plaintiff. This statement was sufficient as an assignment of error to raise the question whether the evidence demanded the finding so directed; and since the bill…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Kelly v. Strouse & Bros.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  2. New Zealand Fire Insurance v. BrewerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
  3. Patterson v. BeckSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
  4. Phillips v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  5. Beall v. Mineral Tone Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1929

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Bowman v. BowmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
  2. Armour v. LunsfordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
  3. Chandler v. PenningtonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1954
  4. Hodges v. Seaboard Loan & Savings Ass'nSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  5. Crowe v. Holloway Development Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1966

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API