Legal Opinion
Durham v. State
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided April 9, 1964No. 22398, 22399, 22402PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Quillian, Justice.
The bill of exceptions assigns as error the judgment overruling the general demurrers to the accusation charging the defendants with the offense of trespass under Ga. L. 1960, p. 142 (Code Ann. § 26-3005). The demurrers attack the statute as unconstitutional on precisely the same grounds as did the demurrers in the case of Clark v. State, 219 Ga. 680 (135 SE2d 270), decided January 30, 1964. This court in the Clark case held the statute to be constitutional and valid. The ruling there made is controlling in the present case.
The bill of exceptions contains an assignment of…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Lanzetta v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Edwards v. South CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Lambert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Johnston v. AderholdCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
- MacK v. ConnorSupreme Court of Georgia · 1964
- United States v. GrimesDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1964