Todd Ex Rel. Todd v. Watts

Plaintiff’s evidence was ample to overcome both defendants’ motions for nonsuit. 3 Strong, N. C. Index, Negligence § 8 (1960). There must, however, be a new trial for errors in the admission of evidence. The court overruled defendants’ objections to the following questions, which plaintiff’s counsel asked Dr. Pig-gott, and denied defendants’ motions to strike the answers elicited:

“Q. Doctor, will you state what diagnosis you made as a result of your examination on March 23rd, 1963?

“A. Yes, sir; my diagnosis reads, from my records: Auto accident with original contusion injuries of forehead and…