Dean v. Carolina Coach Company, Inc.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BRANCH, Justice.
Defendant assigns as error the ruling of Judge McKinnon in allowing Dr. Alexander Webb to express his expert opinion in answer to a hypothetical question, which defendant contends was defective by reason of being factually incomplete. By this assignment of error and its Exception No. 7, defendant also argued in the Court of Appeals that the Court’s failure to strike the unresponsive answer was error.. The Court of Appeals quoted and based its decision on the following rule found in 1 D. Stansbury, North Carolina Evidence § 137 at 452 (Brandis Rev.) :... In framing a…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Lockwood v. McCaskillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- State v. . HollySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
- State v. . MaysSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
- North Carolina State Highway & Public Works Commission v. BlackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Pigford v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Rutledge v. Tultex Corp./Kings YarnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- Young v. Hickory Business FurnitureSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
- Hairston v. Alexander Tank & Equipment Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
- Hickox by and Through Hickox v. HollemanMississippi Supreme Court · 1987
- Ballenger v. Burris Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.