State v. Bock
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
SHARP, Chief Justice.
Defendant’s first and last assignments of error (Nos. 1 and 19) are based upon the premise that capital punishment is prohibited by U. S. Const, amend. VIII and amend. XIV, § 1. This is a contention which we have previously considered, and repeatedly rejected. Further discussion would be merely repetitious. See State v. Waddell, 282 N.C. 431, 194 S.E. 2d 19 (1973) ; State v. Jarrette, 284 N.C. 625, 202 S.E. 2d 721 (1974) ; State v. Fowler, 285 N.C. 90, 203 S.E. 2d 803 (1974) ; State v. Crowder, 285 N.C. 42, 203 S.E. 2d 38 (1974) ; State v. Avery, 286 N.C. 459, 212 S.E. 2d…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Witherspoon v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- State v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
- State v. WaddellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- State v. JarretteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- State v. ColsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- State v. GreenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
- State v. VauseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
- State v. QuickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- State v. WadeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.