Legal Opinion

State v. Bock

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided August 27, 1975No. 37PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHARP, Chief Justice.

Defendant’s first and last assignments of error (Nos. 1 and 19) are based upon the premise that capital punishment is prohibited by U. S. Const, amend. VIII and amend. XIV, § 1. This is a contention which we have previously considered, and repeatedly rejected. Further discussion would be merely repetitious. See State v. Waddell, 282 N.C. 431, 194 S.E. 2d 19 (1973) ; State v. Jarrette, 284 N.C. 625, 202 S.E. 2d 721 (1974) ; State v. Fowler, 285 N.C. 90, 203 S.E. 2d 803 (1974) ; State v. Crowder, 285 N.C. 42, 203 S.E. 2d 38 (1974) ; State v. Avery, 286 N.C. 459, 212 S.E. 2d…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Witherspoon v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. State v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  3. State v. WaddellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  4. State v. JarretteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  5. State v. ColsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. State v. GreenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
  2. State v. VauseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  3. State v. QuickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  4. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  5. State v. WadeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API