Legal Opinion

Spivey v. Newman

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 9, 1950No. 674PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEbviN, J.

We give first consideration to the sixth and fifteenth exceptions, which are based on the refusal of the trial court to dismiss the action upon a compulsory nonsuit under the statute. G.S. 1-183.

The driver of a motor vehicle is not an insurer of the safety of a person riding therein as an invited guest. But he is required by law to exercise reasonable care to protect such person from harm. Accordingly, he is liable for an injury to a guest proximately resulting from his negligence in the operation of the automobile. Wright v. Wright, 229 N.C. 503, 50 S.E. 2d 540; Henderson v. Powell, 221 N.C.…

2Cases cited56 opinions

  1. Ballinger v. . ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  2. Ridge v. Norfolk Southern RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  3. Brewer v. RingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
  4. West Construction Co. v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  5. In Re Will of SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. State v. FosterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  2. State v. FranksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  3. Hunt v. WootenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  4. Mintz v. Town of MurphySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  5. Hewes v. WolfeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API