Legal Opinion

Chicago v. Frye & Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 16, 1919No. 15018PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Cross-appeals from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Jurey, J., entered April 10, 1918, upon findings favorable to the defendant, in an action by a carrier to recover freight charges, tried to the court.

1Opinion of the CourtTolman, J.

J. — The plaintiff sues to recover money alleged to be due for freight on shipments of hogs, cattle, and corn accompanying for feeding purposes, and switching charges accruing during the years 1909 to 1914, both inclusive. Both parties have appealed from the judgment below, and to avoid confusion will be referred to as plaintiff and defendant, respectively. It was announced on oral argument here that the matters in dispute as to the freight on corn, which accompanied the shipments of stock for feeding purposes, *70had been adjusted, and therefore that matter will not be further considered or…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Oregon-Washington Railroad & Navigation Co. v. Seattle Grain Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Garey v. City of PascoWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Chicago & N. W. Ry. Co. v. ZiebarthCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1917

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Cannon v. MillerWashington Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Keen v. Mid-Continent Petroleum CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1945
  3. Gardner v. Basich Bros. Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Baggett Transportation Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
  5. Keen v. Mid-Continent Petroleum CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1945

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API