Keen v. Mid-Continent Petroleum Corporation
District Court, N.D. Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
GRAVEN, District Judge.
On alternative motions to dismiss and for summary judgment. The plaintiff in this action seeks recovery against the defendant under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 29 U.S.C.A. § 201 et seq. The defendant first challenges the jurisdiction of the Court on the question of service. It appears that the defendant a Delaware corporation, has and is doing business in a number of states including Iowa. The residence of the plaintiff does not appear. It further appears that the defendant has and is doing business in that part of Iowa included in the Northern District of…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- United States v. DarbySupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Overnight Motor Transportation Co. v. MisselSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Neirbo Co. v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Chattanooga Foundry & Pipe Works v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Overstreet v. North Shore Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Sandbulte v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1984
- Joseph W. Hales v. Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1974
- Avellanet v. Porto Rican Express Co.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1945
- Keen v. Mid-Continent Petroleum CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1945
- United States v. DavioDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1955
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.