Legal Opinion

State v. Davis

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided December 13, 2004No. 53043-7-IPublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶1 — Adrian Davis pleaded guilty to one count of delivery of cocaine. After the trial court pronounced a sentence of 47 months confinement, Davis moved to withdraw his guilty plea. The trial court refused to consider the merits of Davis’s motion, concluding that judgment had occurred and CrR 4.2(f) constituted a procedural bar. Davis appeals the trial court’s refusal to consider his motion to withdraw his guilty plea. He also appeals the order compelling a DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid) sample pursuant to RCW 43.43.754. Because judgment does not occur under CrR 4.2(f) until the written judgment…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. United States v. Thomas Cameron KincadeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  2. State v. OlivasWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State v. PerezCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1982
  4. State v. HarellCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1996
  5. State v. SurgeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. ChavezCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
  2. State v. PughCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  3. State v. PughCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  4. Personal Restraint Petition Of: Jonathan Paul PitchlynnCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
  5. State Of Washington v. Coleman Joseph NeeserCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API