State v. Surge
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtKennedy, J.
Following their felony convictions, the appellants in these six consolidated appeals were ordered to *450submit to a collection of biological samples for purposes of DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid) identification analysis as required by RCW 43.43.754. Each appellant raises the same issue on appeal: whether our state Supreme Court’s opinion in State v. Olivas, 122 Wn.2d 73, 856 P.2d 1076 (1993), upholding an earlier version of this same statute under Fourth Amendment “special need” analysis, is still good law in light of intervening United States Supreme Court and Ninth Circuit authority. In United…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. SharpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- State v. SurgeWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. SurgeWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. WardCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
- State v. NguyenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
- State v. NguyenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.