Legal Opinion

People v. Hill

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 3, 1946No. Crim. 4015PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhite, J.

The district attorney filed an information in the Superior Court of Los Angeles County wherein the defendant was charged with the commission of five (5) felonies as follows:

Count 1: Kidnapping;

Counts 2 and 5: Rape;

Counts 3 and 4: Violation of section 288a of the Penal Code.

Trial before a jury resulted in the conviction of defendant on all five counts. A motion for a new trial was denied and defendant was sentenced to state prison for the terms prescribed by law on all counts, the sentences to run concurrently.

From the judgment of conviction and the order denying motion for a new trial,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. People v. TedescoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  2. People v. CurtisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  3. People v. SavageCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  4. People v. BickerstaffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  5. People v. ConteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. People v. CarmenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  2. People v. FalsettaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  3. People v. WrightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  4. People v. TeitelbaumCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  5. People v. SlocumCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API