Legal Opinion

People v. Falsetta

California Supreme Court

Decided November 1, 1999No. S071521PublishedCited by 295 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CHIN, J.

In this case we resolve a due process challenge to legislation (Evid. Code, § 1108)1 permitting the admission, in a sex offense case, of the defendant’s other sex crimes for the purpose of showing a propensity to commit such crimes. Although this provision represents a deviation from the historical practice of excluding such “propensity” evidence (see § 1101, subd. (a)), the provision preserves trial court discretion to exclude the evidence if its prejudicial effect outweighs its probative value (§ 352). We conclude, consistent with prior state and federal case law, that…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Patterson v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Old Chief v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Michelson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by295 opinions

  1. People v. PartidaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  2. People v. DonohoIllinois Supreme Court · 2003
  3. People v. AbilezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  4. People v. FuiavaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
  5. People v. SteeleCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002

290 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API