Legal Opinion

People v. Slocum

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 7, 1975No. Crim. 6473PublishedCited by 65 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KERRIGAN, J.

In August 1972, Nancy Fenno informed state officials that her employer and paramour, Wesley Gardner Slocum, physician and surgeon, was defrauding the State of California of thousands of dollars by presenting false Medi-Cal claims. The government launched an extensive, ongoing investigation into the charges and Slocum became aware of it but apparently never suspected that his girl friend (who worked as a nurse-receptionist in his office) was the informant.

In March 1973, he was indicted. In September, his trial commenced. During the first six to seven weeks of the trial…

2Cases cited60 opinions

  1. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Hoffa v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Lopez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. People v. CahanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  5. People v. MickelsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by65 opinions

  1. People v. MirandaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  2. People v. PinholsterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  3. People v. FreemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  4. People v. HillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  5. People v. VinesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API