Legal Opinion

People v. Curtis

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 29, 1939No. Crim. 3223PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhite, J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction upon an indictment charging him with perjury and from an order denying him a new trial. The perjury is alleged to have been committed by him in the course of his testimony given before the grand jury of Los Angeles County. Upon his appearance before the grand jury and prior to any interrogation of him other than to ask his name, address and telephone number, defendant was admonished of his rights in the following language:

“Mr. Curtis, you understand you are not required to testify; you can claim exemption from testifying and refuse to testify on…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. People v. DurrantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. People v. HinshawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  3. People v. GilbertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  4. People v. YantCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  5. People v. BeeslyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. People v. GriffinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  2. People v. GordonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  3. People v. HorowitzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  4. People v. CarterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  5. People v. CodinaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API