Legal Opinion

People v. Bickerstaff

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 3, 1920No. Crim. No. 493PublishedCited by 20 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

An information was filed against the defendant in the superior court of the county of Humboldt, state of California, wherein he was accused of the crime of selling alcoholic liquors in no-license territory, the particular allegation being "that heretofore, to-wit, on the 29th day of July, A.D. 1919, the said J. A. Bickerstaff within the boundary of said 'no-license' territory, in supervisorial district number two, at and in the county of Humboldt, state of California, did willfully, knowingly and unlawfully, sell, furnish, distribute and give away alcoholic liquors, to-wit: beer and which was…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. HolstineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1890
  2. People v. BemmerlyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  3. People v. PaulsellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  4. People v. PeraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
  5. People v. BrannonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. People v. HernandezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  2. In Re JenningsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  3. People v. BrighamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  4. People v. GordonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  5. People v. PearsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API