Legal Opinion

State by State Road Commission v. Rozzelle Et Ux.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1941No. 6408PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRATT, Justice.

Condemnee’s (Joseph W. Rozzelle’s) land lies on the state highway between Salt Lake City and Provo at the “Point of •the Mountain.” The traffic on the highway before realignment ran along the northeast side of his property; after realignment the traffic switched to the new part of the highway running across the southwest part of his land, which was the part condemned in this proceeding. Con-demnee had leased his land for gasoline station purposes. The station was constructed with a frontage on the old highway. In realigning the road a cut was dug upon the land condemned. This…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. State Road Commission v. District Court, Fourth Judicial Dist.Utah Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Block v. Salt Lake Rapid Transit Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Springville Banking Co. v. BurtonUtah Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Utah State Road Commission v. MiyaUtah Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Mason v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Hampton v. State Ex Rel. Road CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Utah Road Commission v. HansenUtah Supreme Court · 1963

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API