Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. State Road Commission v. District Court, Fourth Judicial Dist.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1937No. 5897PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOYT, District Judge.

In this case the plaintiffs have applied for a writ of prohibition to prohibit the defendants from further proceeding with the trial of an action pending in the district court of Utah county, in which the defendants J. P. Gourley, Bessie Gourley, Charles A. Smith, Rachel Daniels, and Christian P. Andreasen, administrator of the estate of Kate Andrea-sen, deceased, are plaintiffs, and the State Road Commission of Utah and L. A. Young et al., doing business as L. A. Young Construction Company, are defendants. The action filed in the district court was brought to enjoin the…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. United States v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Monongahela Navigation Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  3. Proprietors of the Charles River Bridge v. Proprietors of the Warren BridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1837
  4. Poindexter v. GreenhowSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  5. Hopkins v. Clemson Agricultural College of South CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1911

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Colman v. Utah State Land BoardUtah Supreme Court · 1990
  2. DeBry v. NobleUtah Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Springville Banking Co. v. BurtonUtah Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Provo River Water Users' Ass'n v. CarlsonUtah Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Bingham v. Roosevelt City Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 2010

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API