Legal Opinion
Hampton v. State Ex Rel. Road Commission
Utah Supreme Court
Decided September 30, 1968No. 10997PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CALLISTER, Justice:
Appellants commenced this action against the State of Utah, the State Road Commission, the individual members thereof, and others involved in the construction of a highway, Interstate 15. Appellants are the owners of certain real property with improvements thereon located in the City of Clearfield, Utah.
In their first cause of action, appellants alleged that the construction activities had been conducted in such a negligent manner that their property had been damaged by vibration caused by the operation of equipment, by the deposit of excessive amounts of dust, by excessive…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Iowa State Highway Commission v. SmithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1957
- Deaconess Hospital v. Washington State Highway CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1965
- Brock v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1965
- State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. MeierSupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
- Springville Banking Co. v. BurtonUtah Supreme Court · 1960
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Colman v. Utah State Land BoardUtah Supreme Court · 1990
- Utah Department of Transportation v. Admiral Beverage Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 2011
- Utah State Road Commission v. MiyaUtah Supreme Court · 1974
- Parrish v. LAYTON CITY CORPORATIONUtah Supreme Court · 1975
- State v. Harvey Real EstateUtah Supreme Court · 2002
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.