Legal Opinion

Springville Banking Co. v. Burton

Utah Supreme Court

Decided February 1, 1960No. 9066PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HENRIOD, Justice.

Appeal from a dismissal of plaintiff’s mandamus action which sought to require members of the State Road Commission to initiate eminent domain proceedings to assess damages allegedly caused by impairment of ingress to and egress from plaintiff’s property. Affirmed. Costs to defendants.

Plaintiff owns a lot and building on the East side of Main Street at Seventh South in Springville, Utah. Main Street is a segment of a transcontinental highway. R runs North-South. The Commission placed *102a concrete island in the middle of Main Street, eliminating U-turns and left turns, and…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Lynch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. United States v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  3. Bingham v. BD. OF ED. OF OGDEN CITYUtah Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Dougherty v. VidalNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Muse v. Mississippi State Highway CommissionMississippi Supreme Court · 1958

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Colman v. Utah State Land BoardUtah Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Darnall v. StateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1961
  3. DeBry v. NobleUtah Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Sheffield v. TurnerUtah Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Rocky Mountain Thrift Stores, Inc. v. Salt Lake City Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1989

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API