Attorney Grievance Commission v. Haupt
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Sept. Term, 1984.
1Opinion of the Court
RODOWSKY, Judge.
Respondent, Bruce Widenor Haupt (Haupt), was admitted to the Bar of this Court on June 23, 1973. He was also admitted to the Bar of the District of Columbia. This disciplinary proceeding involves the third and fourth petitions in this State charging Haupt with professional misconduct.
We suspended him for thirty days in Montgomery County Bar Association v. Haupt, 277 Md. 326, 353 A.2d 629 (1976). At the end of a high speed automobile chase of the adverse party in a divorce case, Haupt had entered a private home uninvited and directly confronted the adverse party. We suspended…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Matter of HauptDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
- Maryland State Bar Ass'n v. PhoebusCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. NothsteinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. FlynnCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
- Matter of HauptDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. SabghirCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. GittensCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. McCoyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.