Legal Opinion

Levenson v. Lippman

New York Court of Appeals

Decided February 15, 2005PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

The issue presented in this appeal is whether the Chief Administrative Judge acted within the authority granted him by the New York State Constitution when he amended section *285127.2 (b) of the Rules of the Chief Administrator of the Courts (22 NYCRR 127.2 [b]). As amended, the rule permits an administrative judge to review an order of a trial judge setting an award of compensation in excess of the statutory limits set forth in section 722-b of the County Law. We conclude that the Chief Administrative Judge acted within his authority and declare that section 127.2 (b) is…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Werfel v. AgrestaNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Matter of Dir.(bodek)New York Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. Met Council, Inc. v. CrossonNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. Levenson v. LippmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

4Cited by11 opinions

  1. Bliven v. HuntCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
  2. Bliven v. HuntDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2007
  3. In re Sing W.C. Sing Y.C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  4. Parry v. County of OnondagaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  5. Goehler v. Cortland CountyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API